sub weld ment 10 20 451
 

drawing 10 20 400
2. referrers to sub weldment 10 20 450 is that not sub weldment 10 20 451?

Thanks MAC. The note 2 should read:

. . . . and the sub-weldments 10 20 451 W or 10 20 452 W as distance gauges . . . .

Received via PM:

Drawing Typo Part 4 PDF Sheet M1 30 200:

the spring is labled item 4 and is item 3 on the list

Thanks to the donor!

Drawings 10 20 200 A and 10 20 225 A:

- Show the clamp strip in cross-section, showing the tapped hole

- Add the gantry tube in cross-section, through a hole

- Add another view with the whole system tightened together (in addition to the exploded view)

Dwg confusion
 

I need some clarification with dwg 10 10 000. At the bottom of the dwg there is a close up view of a resin filled csk carriage bolt. What does the dotted line in the dwg signify?

Thanks

Rick.

Well spotted, and good question. . . . . . but, I can't see any reason for that bit of line being there! :o

Great product Gerald.
I am enjoying gathering the parts and learning about the MM. Some very clever design ideas are implemented here.
I suggest you consider adding an outline of 10 20 440 onto dwg 10 20 200 (210, 220 225) to help clarify the assembly and how the hole sizes are different. It took me a little while to realise this is where the adjustment is for doing the alignment.

Thanks for the well supported product
David

This didn't make sense 2 years ago:

From a recent discussion, it was the inch dimensions that are slightly off, I only check the metric stuff.

Just a minor point but I dont see any mention of fastener sizes on 10 60 100 or anywhere else in the 10 60 series.

M1 30 000 A references Higher Drawing 10 30 000 A. This does not appear to be in pdf pack.

I hope you dont mind me being a nit picker here but I figure if I see an error I should tell someone. Up to you of course to ignore it.

any way another one
10 40 000 and 10 40 014 both named 250mm Z Slide Assembly

See post #36 of 03 August 2009 above

Ok I wont waste my time any more.

Drawing 10 20 440 S A shows dimensions y=500(19.7") and just below that (2330)(91.7"), what is correct? with a 60" y it would be 79.7" or 2024mm which is far less than the 2330mm.

The (2330)[91.7"] was my actual dimension because I built for a 1830 [72"] wide table.

If you want to have a 60" wide table, then you must +19.7" as the drawing shows in blue.

Thanks for the clarity Gerald, I'm cutting steel and didn't want to muff it up on first cuts.