MechMate CNC Router Forum

Go Back   MechMate CNC Router Forum > Structure & Mechanics > 10. Base Table
Register Options Profile Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 06:36
kanankeban
Just call me: Hector #89
 
Monterrey
Mexico
Re-alignment after dis-assembly - getting all parts into position at the new location

Hi,
I almost done with the table fabrication, in my case my second step will be to fabricate the rails. My table is not welded, is 100% bolted, although after assamble it presents just .1 degree error in flatness and 1/32 in squarness I have a issue that differs in a bolted table and a welded one. Each time you dissassble and assamble the squarness between table (rails) and board might be different...solution: instead of plain circle holes on the rails, Im wondering if using oblongs in the rails on size larger than the bolts might give me a margin to align rails with the board each time I assamble the table???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 08:03
Gerald D
Just call me: Gerald (retired)
 
Cape Town
South Africa
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanankeban View Post
I'm wondering if using oblongs in the rails on size larger than the bolts might give me a margin to align rails with the board each time I assamble the table???
Oblong holes are difficult to make. It is far easier to make a bigger round hole with a drill. For our MechMate construction, it is absolutely no problem to drill the holes 1 to 3mm oversize.

With that freedom of movement, everything can be aligned quite easily, and then bolted up tight.

Before you dis-assemble a joint, drill a another small hole alongside the bolt. A 4mm hole is a good size. Drill right through:


When you re-assemble the joint, put a "roll-pin" through the small hole:


A nominal 4mm roll pin fits correctly in a drilled 4mm hole. (That pin will be about 5mm before hammering it in)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 08:06
sailfl
Just call me: Nils #12
 
Winter Park, FL
United States of America
This is a great idea.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 09:09
kanankeban
Just call me: Hector #89
 
Monterrey
Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerald D View Post
Oblong holes are difficult to make. It is far easier to make a bigger round hole with a drill. For our MechMate construction, it is absolutely no problem to drill the holes 1 to 3mm oversize.

With that freedom of movement, everything can be aligned quite easily, and then bolted up tight.

Before you dis-assemble a joint, drill a another small hole alongside the bolt. A 4mm hole is a good size. Drill right through:


When you re-assemble the joint, put a "roll-pin" through the small hole:


A nominal 4mm roll pin fits correctly in a drilled 4mm hole. (That pin will be about 5mm before hammering it in)
After I posted...It came to my mind same thoughts ...just a oversize hole will solve the problem of the necesarry play needed for alingment. The pin idea sound great...I was also thinking of welding some stops in specific locations to force a squarnes when assembling
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 17:18
Doug_Ford
Just call me: Doug #3
 
Conway (Arkansas)
United States of America
Gerald,

You are truly a genius. I know this isn't an original idea but you keep coming up with all of these solutions. Only a genius could do that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 18:12
Leko
Just call me: Leko
 
Kaukapakapa
New Zealand
Wouldn't two small holes with pins work better? I don't see how 1 pin and 1 bolt in an over sized hole will realign things back to where they were. Won't the members revolve around the pin to the extent allowed by the bolt in the big hole thereby letting the whole frame rack out of square?2 pins.jpg

Last edited by Leko; Fri 23 January 2009 at 18:16.. Reason: add image
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Fri 23 January 2009, 20:08
Gerald D
Just call me: Gerald (retired)
 
Cape Town
South Africa
The frame has diagonal braces which hold it square. You could never rely on a single bolt to hold squareness.

Or, put another way, outside of the view that we show above, there is some other part that holds it square.

Doug, the pin idea is not my original.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Sat 24 January 2009, 10:22
Leko
Just call me: Leko
 
Kaukapakapa
New Zealand
Well of course there are other pieces, cross members, braces, and a big spoil board to hold things square. But, I thought the intention here was to take apart a machine that has been assembled and squared and ease reassembly after moving it. My intention was not that the drive pins would keep things square while cutting. My understanding was that they are to realign all the pieces (frame, cross members & braces) during reassembly. All of the holes in these various pieces have some adjustability but the addition of the small drive pins allow the pieces to register back to their previous locations so that you can tighten up all of those other pieces. My point was that with the addition of 1 pin as you suggested could remove maybe 85% of the required realignment, whereas the addition of a second pin at each location would remove almost all of the realignment. I also thought that one would put these alignment pins in all of the cross members, frames, and braces.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Sat 24 January 2009, 11:04
Gerald D
Just call me: Gerald (retired)
 
Cape Town
South Africa
Here is the bigger picture. In both of these examples, the key is that there is some bracing to prevent bolted joints from rotating/twisting. If that is taken care of, single pins per bolt are enough. If there is no bracing to prevent rotating forces at single bolts, the basic design is faulty - spend energy on fixing the design instead of doubling up on pins.


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Sat 24 January 2009, 17:42
kanankeban
Just call me: Hector #89
 
Monterrey
Mexico
Gerald,
I went to my thoughts again and I really thing that no more squerness mechanisms backups are needed if the table is fully bolted, of course with the rails having a way of adjusting as mentioned earlier, is matter of tunning the table each time is assemled, do you thing so?...it will be just a couple of minutes worth of work.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Sat 24 January 2009, 20:28
Gerald D
Just call me: Gerald (retired)
 
Cape Town
South Africa
The major alignment work is to get the rails straight when they are screwed to the main beams. That is when we will use loose shims. When the table is moved, we will leave the rails fixed to the main beams and we will not adjust those shims again. Therefore, the problem after a move is to get the two main beams exactly as they were before. That type of tuning is quite quick, especially if the roll pins are used.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Sun 25 January 2009, 11:48
hennie
Just call me: Hennie #23
 
Roodepoort JHB
South Africa
My five cents.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PIN.jpg (9.3 KB, 693 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Register Options Profile Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.