MechMate CNC Router Forum

Go Back   MechMate CNC Router Forum > Personal Build Histories > Introduce yourself and start planning
Register Options Profile Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old Wed 09 January 2013, 16:55
lolailando
Just call me: lolailando
 
troy ny
United States of America
Hi, from Upstate NY. 5x12

Hi all,
I have been lurking around this forum on and off for 6 or 7 years.
I started buying parts for a build before I new about the mechmate.

I am still far away from starting my build but this are what I have come up with:

-Size 5"x12"...I have enough space and it seems just a few more bucks on steel.
- Cut mdf, laminates, plywood etc... Thin Aluminum ocassionally.
- Cut large EPS (polystyrene) foam 2'x5'x12' aprox .
- Second gantry later for plasma head. Since most of the time I may not be cutting 12", the second gantry could just stay at the other end of the table and or take it off when I am cutting 12' (is this stupid? should I just add a couple feet of table?)
- What's the highest z-axis movement I could safely modify the mechmate to just cut foam? 24"
- would you build just a regular gantry first, then add a second head in the same gantry with larger z-movement? or would the same head cut z-24" on foam and just z-10" on mdf etc... and still be stiff enough?
-Servos: I have 4x sanyo Denki p50b08040vcks7. I bought them cheap before I discover Mechmate. I beleive they have a brake 24v, and encoders and are more than powerfull enough 400w, mounting plate plate 86mm. I also got some driver chips from a young guy in Europe who programed a really neat servo drive and used to exchange them for a few foreign beers. I would still need to build the electronic boards and solder.
- I have heard that one of this servos can be use as a cutting head/spindle with a vfd
- I wouldn't mind going with the steppers if the advice is that the servos would complicate the build too much
- I also have several of the expensive linear bearing assemblies that I bought cheap before I discover mechmate. I could use them for the z-axis or I could keep them for future CNC-Mill build.
- Table design: I would like to drop the middle of the structure like in this one:
http://www.mechmate.com/Forum/messages/2/168.jpg
but go across horizontally with the c-chanels even lower so I can fit a 2' deep block of foam. Can this structurally be solve? or would it make the table so weak it couldn't cut plywood nice? A Regular table would be bolted/pined on top for mdf and plasma cutting.
- I need really low accuracy to cut the foam...even a 1/4" off would be fine ... bt no good for plasma/plywood
- trying to make too many things at once? probably...just brainstorming to understand some limits
thanks in advance everyone
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Wed 09 January 2013, 17:00
darren salyer
Just call me: Darren #101
 
Wentzville mo
United States of America
I guess I don't understand the thinking behind a convertible machine.
It seems to me a plasma cutter would be a dirtier operation with a water tabe and all.
Seems that wouldn't mix well with putting wood/acrylic plastics on the table above the water table.
Several have mentioned doing this.
Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Wed 09 January 2013, 20:32
lolailando
Just call me: lolailando
 
troy ny
United States of America
In an ideal world I would have 3 or 4 2000SF shops, one for metal, one for wood, one for plastics etc....
In our limited reality it may not be that difficult to empty the water table and bolt a cutting table on top of it every other week or whenever you need it. I think the extra work is worth the effort for some tinckers who like to work on different materials.
I do plumbing, roofs, plaster, brick, tile, carpentry etc.... most people would hate to something new and different every day,...other people can't live without it.
Building a second machine is another 4k plus time versus a couple hours of cleaning and changing tables whenever needed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Thu 10 January 2013, 11:50
lolailando
Just call me: lolailando
 
troy ny
United States of America
ok, I just fond out the servos I have are AC....didn't remember. they are the best of the best but all affordable servo drives out there like gecko are made for DC servos.
So I will go with a set of sttepers and drives like everyone else for simplicity (it would cost more to buy just the servo AC drivers than a whole set of stepper and drivers).

I am still wondering what is the best structural solution to drop the table down. I am starting to think to go more conservative and drop the support table structure only 8-10".
In the future if i want to mill 2-3' thick EPS I can build a very tall gantry since flex would not be a problem cutting EPS. I guess the reason the MM has such a low gantry compare to even commercial ones is to gain stiffness in a simple/affordable way.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Thu 10 January 2013, 13:50
smreish
Just call me: Sean - #5, 28, 58 and others
 
Orlando, Florida
United States of America
Lola,
It's easier to lower the table and build a longer z-stroke thank alter the gantry. I've done it to a MM - twice.

If you want an extreme cutting depth, then make the side sections taller and then add a cheap MDF box ontop of the spoil board to make machine standard height.
I have lowered the working deck height to the concrete floor for foam sculpting and completely removed the table all together for a 48" deep cutting area with a 48" stroke z-slide for some extreme statue work.

What I mean is instead of a C- section of 8", double that up to 16" or greater with either a built up square tube - or other method - to get your height. Or, even use steel angle 2.5 x 2.5 angle with 10-16" flat bar to make your own C-section for the side rails at about the same cost. Then, build a cheap MDF box that is 8" tall to get the table height back up to standard z-depth....nothing in the build then changes. When you need a really long stroke z- axis, build a longer slide, heavier counterbalance - and your done.

You can see how I did it in the MM #5 thread.

Last edited by smreish; Thu 10 January 2013 at 13:54..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Thu 10 January 2013, 23:00
lolailando
Just call me: lolailando
 
troy ny
United States of America
thanks smreish,
I took a fast look thought the 17 pages post and I couldnt get to see but one picture that barely shows the structure after you lower the table.
Would you mind sending me some pics?
or did I look at the wrong post?
i would like to see how you resolved the structural steel, and if it is stiff enough to mill/cut plywood etc..
thanks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Sat 12 January 2013, 07:11
smreish
Just call me: Sean - #5, 28, 58 and others
 
Orlando, Florida
United States of America
That machine is gone, but I will do a quick sketch to illustrate my post on Monday when back to office. The posts I referred you to was to see the elongated z slide on a standard gantry. The machine bed was removed for that series of work.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Sat 12 January 2013, 13:09
lolailando
Just call me: lolailando
 
troy ny
United States of America
thanks a lot,
I appreciate that. I do not want to reinvent the wheel.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Sat 12 January 2013, 13:15
smreish
Just call me: Sean - #5, 28, 58 and others
 
Orlando, Florida
United States of America
The structure of the table in #5 build is a very standard MM with bolted cross bearers.
To deepen the cut envelope, I lower the cross bearers by adding a spacer.
When I build my next machine, I will build the table with more over gantry height by having a "higher" c-channel side.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Register Options Profile Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Today's Posts


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.