MechMate CNC Router Forum

MechMate CNC Router Forum (http://www.mechmate.com/forums/index.php)
-   General - MM Build (http://www.mechmate.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Weighing in... (http://www.mechmate.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3746)

JasonC Fri 23 March 2012 08:13

Weighing in...
 
I have a simple general question. Why are so many parts built so heavy duty? I under stand the need for rigidity but from what I have seen theres parts that could be refined for weight reduction and still maintain it strength?


Jason

gooberdog Fri 23 March 2012 08:32

Hi Jason,
Without reference to specific parts it's hard to discuss. Weight (mass) is not always bad. Another factor is that the plan accommodates a simply equipped shop and uses standard readily available structural steel shapes.
Chuck

JasonC Fri 23 March 2012 08:50

Got ya. Didnt think of that.

Jas

Gerald D Fri 23 March 2012 10:33

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonC View Post
parts that could be refined for weight reduction and still maintain it strength?
We want stiffness in addition to strength. (Stiffness is very different to strength). More stiffness gives more rigidity and gives less vibrations. We also need some mass to dampen vibrations.

None of these factors were ever calculated or analysed. All shapes and thicknesses were selected on experience, gut feel and comparison to similar machines, to get a compromise between cost, availability and performance. It seems to have turned out fairly okay, but I would be the last to say it is perfect.

In retrospect, I can't think of any significant part that can be reduced in mass without expecting some decrease in performance.

JasonC Fri 23 March 2012 20:40

Cool. I guess looking at it a little more and a little "my" logic the moving parts are the only parts that I see that could be decreased mass by just useing aluminum vs steel, gear reductions plates, Y car ,Z slide..etc.

Has anyone tried to reduce vibration with apropriate dampers. I use Dynomat on my audio builds and it works great.

Jas

Gerald D Fri 23 March 2012 23:27

Why would you be happy to reduce the stiffness of the moving parts?

IN-WondeR Sat 24 March 2012 00:50

You cant use something like dynomat to reduce vibrations on a CNC. Vibrations are not caused by sound, it's caused by the fact that you have a cutting head which moves through a piece of material. Only weight can reduce vibration there.

The Mechmate is already a light CNC, so making it lighter will only increase things like vibrations, and make it less rigid..

JasonC Sat 24 March 2012 06:45

I dont believe I said anything about reducing stiffness, just replacing heavy steel parts with equally and structurely strong alum parts. Looks like this might be a venture ill experiment on my own..lol.

Jas


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerald D View Post
Why would you be happy to reduce the stiffness of the moving parts?

Alan_c Sat 24 March 2012 07:44

For aluminium to have the same strength as steel, it has to be 3x thicker and is more costly!

Axel1966 Sat 24 March 2012 12:04

Hi Jason,
I asked the same questions fiew times ago.
Trying to make the MechMate Lighter is not a good idea.

The fact is, weight and heavy duty construction is important to get a nice cut quality.
Especialy with the MechMate engineering, with V-Rails and V-rollers system.
Now I've maked up my mind, and I think about oversize some components
to be sure to get the best cut quality possible.

Don't waste your time on this subject, any possible angle
will lead to the necessity to build strong and heavy. ;)

Some people would like to build a lighter cnc table, because they'll manage light
forces : because of the use of a laser cutter instead a spindle for example.
But they'll need other systems too, like suported round rails and linear bearings,
much more expensive, but which allows lighter structures.

I asked this question, because I was trying to save money on structure.
It was realy a bad idea, because the table might be the cheaper chapter,
in the construction of your MechMate.
Stepper motors and drivers may be more expensive than the table itself. ;)

JasonC Sun 25 March 2012 12:25

Thanks Axel

You have made the point perfectly and the other guys too. This is probly a case of "lighter isnt always better". Im slowly building mine and am seeing the general overall mass of this sucker(10 foot x 5 foot). I guess I should just finish the build first and see the end result.

Thanks guys
Jason

WTI Sun 25 March 2012 21:22

Sure, if you were only going to cut foam for modeling, then you could make it lighter.

But for the rest of us who cut wood and the occasional aluminum, we need all the weight and stiffness we can get.

Look back at the Shopbot archives and see how many people would have to make the machine stiffer, stronger, better....the MM already incorporates all of these improvements - no need to reinvent the wheel.

If you want to add mass to the MM, you can fill the hollow base/leg tubes with sand.

KenC Mon 26 March 2012 07:14

Any lighter, MM will hop around one's shop when a cat bump into it... If one consider that as an advantage.

Kobus_Joubert Mon 26 March 2012 08:07

What about a concrete bed...or a brick and mortar base. I am going to build my new workshop in the near future and was thinking of putting my MM on a solid base as my existing table is a bit on the light side.
Any comments.

TechGladiator Mon 26 March 2012 08:47

@Kobus; It should be fine as long as you use Steel Rebar..:D

Axel1966 Mon 26 March 2012 12:55

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobus_Joubert View Post
What about a concrete bed...or a brick and mortar base. I am going to build my new workshop in the near future and was thinking of putting my MM on a solid base as my existing table is a bit on the light side.
Any comments.
Well, for any reason you may want to move out someday, or sell your MM (for a better one).
It can be wise to rather reinforce the existing structure or to upgrade lightest parts.

KenC Mon 26 March 2012 22:21

Remove the table structure & bolt the U beams on concrete floor...
Less work & now you have your whole building to damp your cutting vibration :D

Gerald D Mon 26 March 2012 23:10

It is interesting that guys who have built and operated MMs, who then consider building other machines or making big modifications, all want to go with more weight.

Kobus_Joubert Mon 26 March 2012 23:41

I don't care about 'IF' I move....the working part of the MM is still there, only needs a table.
Gerald you have seen my table made from the round pipes of an old radio mast.
That thing sometimes shake so bad that I have to stabilise it between the existing 2 walls.
Shaking like that affects the cut quality as we all know.
When I move to my new shop I would like to make it BETTER. ;)

KenC Tue 27 March 2012 05:27

Kobus, you need lots of cross braces. :)
How fast are you running your MM? on small work piece, about 100 x100mm work piece very high density carving, my machine will jerk around like crazy at 1200mm/min feed rate.

Kobus_Joubert Tue 27 March 2012 06:30

You telling me stuff that we all know. I was just thinking that I could make a real SOLID base while I have the opportunity.

Axel1966 Tue 27 March 2012 09:11

Some people uses polymer-concrete structure.
I think it's better than bricks or concrete (even fiber-concrete).
Concrete can erode to dust with vibrations. No probem with resin-base.
Through, it's possible to make dismantable parts.
Some info here : Polymer-granite on CNC Zone

TechGladiator Tue 27 March 2012 19:53

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerald D View Post
It is interesting that guys who have built and operated MMs, who then consider building other machines or making big modifications, all want to go with more weight.
Although I have only been using mine for a short period of time, I can see why people would like to add more weight. I am guessing it has to do with acceleration and feed rate BUT there are some nice jolts every once in a while.

Red_boards Wed 28 March 2012 18:19

My (very heavy) table is linked to its feet by 12mm bolts. I'm sure these and the rubber feet bend in response to gantry direction changes, so it sometimes looks as though the table is hopping, even though it isn't. I'm guessing some "give" is not bad, and might even prevent failure of a rigid brace?

Kobus,
One of the machines I contracted to in the past had its rails bolted to the floor with a 3m tower riding on them.

Gerald D Wed 28 March 2012 23:41

Some guys only use their CNC routers for cutting rectangular cabinet parts - they can build lighter / more flexible.

Shopfitters who cut gentle curves on counter tops can build lighter / more flexible.

But, if you have a lot of rapid stop/start motion (for example, cutting letters into signboards) then you will see a lot of shaking and consider building heavier / stiffer.

Axel1966 Thu 29 March 2012 01:52

Good to know. Thanks

normand blais Thu 29 March 2012 04:21

Hi Kobus
I would go for concrete at near 2 ton a cubic yard .you could even cut nice arch form on MM. Get the mixer to backup to your shop
Gerald ,do you remember the guy who ''swisscheese '' his shopbot ,it was cromed if I remember right .

KenC Thu 29 March 2012 07:32

Just cast whole table leg right up to the beams in situ.
That should do it nicely.

Gerald D Thu 29 March 2012 08:39

or, bolt the main beams direct to your floor and work on your knees :)

Normand, I remember those holy shiny pictures!

JasonC Thu 05 April 2012 08:48

I was doing some drilling last weekend on the MM. i climbed up on the table and now i see where the mass is needed. I was able to move the table by shifting my weight back and forth fast. wow! the table is solid but I was suprize on how easy it was to wiggle. I may evan consisted floor anchors if it is a problem when Im finished. Im also creating a space at the bottom to store sheets of MDF or ply for added mass.

Jason


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.